Showing posts with label professional standards. Show all posts
Showing posts with label professional standards. Show all posts

Monday, October 5, 2015

A500.9.4.RB_Course Reflection

             MLSD 500: Leadership Found in Research
     A500.9.4RB – Course Reflections
Submitted to ERAU Worldwide
in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements of the Degree of MBAA














Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University
Worldwide
Online Campus

October 6, 2015








         




Course Reflections


It was quoted that technology continues to expand and intertwine itself with everyday life. When teaching students about higher learning, ePortfolios offer numerous benefits, like facilitating reflection on learning in a course, showcasing career skills, aiding in program review, and showcasing professional standards (Chatham-Carpenter, Seawel, & Raschig, 2009).

Everything that we have handed in for this course supports this theory. We wrote blogs about our professional and personal standards; we created concept maps to allow us to think conceptually, while using a new software program; and we captured and edited research into media master showpieces.


The course I am referring to is MLSD 500, a.k.a., Leadership Foundation in Research. We started the course learning and then debating the differences between a claim and a fact. An example is that Pluto was known factually to be a planet. I had been taught and therefore always believed that Pluto was a planet within our solar system.




Scientists rescinded their claim and, instead, years later, have identified the “planet” rather a “dwarf planet”. FACT. Really!!?? I don’t believe you anymore! Is it a dog?



This course guided the students in the discipline of discourse and debate on topics like fallacies. The concept of fallacy dates back to the time of Aristotle. I did not realize that there were so many fallacies and outcomes of rationalization. There happen to be more than 200.

I gravitated toward the black-or-white fallacy, or the limitation of two choices that allow only two outcomes. I have definitely rationalized myself out of a two-option problem. I like this example of a black-or-white fallacy:  Will you contribute $20 to our environmental fund, or are you on the side of environmental destruction?  A rational response is: I do want to prevent the destruction of our environment, but I don't want to give $20 to your fund (Dowden, 2015).

I feel as though politics and party lines tend to be black or white and not a lot of color in between.



Speaking of politics, the Iran Nuclear Deal was actually being debated and voted upon simultaneously, during the course of our learning process and debates regarding critical thinking. Our President actually spoke about critical thinking numerous times in his speech. Iran's supreme leader, the Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, demonstrated that he also thought critically about the destruction of a country and their people - many times, publicly.




Somehow the Iran Nuclear Deal went through, and the very next day Iran's supreme leader, the Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, gave a speech that Israel will not see the end of the next 25 years, according to the IRN. "God willing, there will be no such thing as a Zionist regime in 25 years. Until then, struggling, heroic and jihadi morale will leave no moment of serenity for Zionists" (McLaughlin, 2015).  




Oh good.  I am glad that leaders are demonstrating their critical thinking capabilities, as I have been asked to do over the past few months. In fact, I was even asked to submit a research project that covered improving some area of personal significance. I had been struggling to develop a twenty-year plan. Actually, the past four years, I had been searching for answers or even some guidance. This project enabled me to hone in on my long-term goal and to develop an implementation strategy. As part of the strategy, I identified potential companies that aligned with my values, goals and desired lifestyle working environments.

The outcome was fantastic! I had the opportunities for deep reflection, the time to reach out to those who truly knew me – my family and friends – by creating a survey to validate my direction, and the time to identify companies that were in alignment with my vision. I came up with not just one summation for my twenty-year plan but two videos!

And this is where I signoff as ERAUgirl76, concluding my course reflection with my action research report videos:











Cheers to another fantastic ERAU semester!



References:
Chatham-Carpenter, April. (2009). Avoiding the Pitfalls: Current Practices and Recommendations for ePortfolios in Higher Education. Retrieved from pdf.
Dowden, Bradley. 2015. Fallacies. IEP, A Peer-Reviewed Academic Resource. California State University, Sacramento. ISSN 2161-0002. Retrieved from http://www.iep.utm.edu/fallacy/#Black-or-White
McLaughlin, Eliott, C. (2015). Iran's Supreme Leader: There will no such thing as Israel in 25 years. Retrieved from http://www.cnn.com/2015/09/10/middleeast/iran-khamenei-israel-will-not-exist-25-years/

Friday, September 25, 2015

A500.7.3.RB_Quantitative Research Reflection


             MLSD 500: Leadership Found in Research
     A500.7.3RB – Qualitative Research Reflection
Submitted to ERAU Worldwide
in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements of the Degree of MBAA














Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University
Worldwide
Online Campus

September 24, 2015









         




Social researchers believe that patterns and regularities occur in society and that these are not simply random events. Patterns necessitate interest in the formulation of explanations. These explanations are presented in theories that allow us to come to a sense of reality. On the basis of theory, we can develop hypotheses about relationships that ought to exist, if the theory is valid (Mamia, 2015).


Empirical research is the study of an aspect of reality. Research data is obtained by asystematic method of empirical observation. Theoretical research studies problems related to theories of a discipline. Research data consists of previous research. Scientific research is a dialogue between theory and empirical. Most research involves both theoretical and empirical element (Mamia, 2015).

Qualitative research aims at understanding. It answers primarily to “how” questions, i.e. How does this work? Meanwhile, an explanation is the goal of quantitative research, which primarily addresses “why” questions, i.e. Why does this work? Both qualitative and quantitative research can aim for a description of social reality (Mamia, 2015).

The quantitative method is based on the idea that social phenomena can be quantified, measured and expressed numerically. The information about a social phenomenon is expressed in numeric terms that can be analyzed by statistical methods. The observations can be directly numeric information, or they can be classified into numeric variables. Observations are transformed into a data matrix in which each observation unit occupies one row and each variable one column. The data matrix is the starting point for the analysis. The quantitative method enables the research and description of social structures and processes that are not directly observable (Mamia, 2015).



I have enjoyed collecting data, analyzing the results and trending the figures. I now understand how easy it is to be misled by incomplete or manipulated data and the value of random sampling to minimize risk. In a random sample, the risk of sampling error can be statistically estimated. With random sample, there is a definite level of confidence (Mamia, 2015).  Prior to this understanding, I had, no doubt, come to conclusions based on information that had not been properly vetted for balanced, unbiased input. My new understanding of the research process for data collection has brought clarity to the importance of unbiased data in quantifying conclusions, particularly as it relates to business decisions.



Reference:

Mamia, Tero. (2015). Quantitative Research Methods. General Studies/ISS. Retrieved from Microsoft PowerPoint Presentation. 

Sunday, September 6, 2015

A5004.3RB_AdorableBalletSlippers


             MLSD 500: Leadership Found in Research
     A500.4.3RB – Adorable Ballet Slippers 
Submitted to ERAU Worldwide
in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements of the Degree of MBAA














Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University
Worldwide
Online Campus

September 6, 2015








         




Adorable Ballet Slippers


      The lesson is about choice. Choice is the power of picking the best part, person or thing (Merriam-Webster, 2015). All humans share a basic need and desire for choice, we don't all see choice in the same places or to the same extent. Studies have shown that when you give people ten or more options when they're making a choice, they make poorer decisions, whether it be health care, investment, or other critical areas. Yet still, many of us believe that we should make all our own choices and seek out even more of them (Iyengar, 2010).

      Human behavior is shaped by the environment, by deliberate and non-deliberate conditioning, training and education. If this were the case, then choice is really conditioning, training and education of what is available and selecting deliberately or non-deliberately (Pecorino & O’Sullivan, 2002).

      If choice is reliant upon the environment that one is exposed to, than the selection is influenced by social class, education and upbringing (Pecorino & O’Sullivan, 2002).





      The fundamental difference culturally in our ideas is about choice. Here in America, when a paying customer makes a reasonable request based on their preferences, they have the right to have that request met. Opposed to Japan, where it is the people’s duty to protect those who don't know any better. Americans tend to think that their choices best fulfills an innate and universal desire for choice in all humans. These are assumptions that don't always hold true in many cultures (Iyengar, 2010).

      Americans believe that choice personally affects you and your preferences. Americans believe that by making their own choices, their own interests will be accounted for, which is essential for success and being true to oneself. Americans are exposed to more options each passing day and it is perceived that the choice one makes in America is a direct correlation to who they are, what they choose, and why they choose it (Iyengar, 2010).

I believe in transparent and authentic data based information so I can empower myself to make rational decisions. As leaders, we need to encourage and empower people to learn as much as possible, to vet data for its authenticity and simplicity, so that they may be informed and equipped to make good choices. 

According to Sheena Iyengar (2010), we become overwhelmed by choice, sometimes even afraid of it. If we were to educate the majority of the population and foster an empowerment environment, then this might not be a result. Dr. Iyengar states that choice no longer offers opportunities, but imposes constraints. It's not a marker of liberation, but of suffocation by meaningless minutiae (2010).

I agree with Dr Iyengar’s position that we are suffocating from the minutiae – overwhelmed by the details of biased presentations that leave us easy prey for manipulation, invalidating the concept of choice. That does not release us, however, from our own responsibilities as leaders to continually search for authentically vetted data in order to make sound, rational decisions. We must remove the clutter in the search for truth. If we do not implement this as leaders, we will make ourselves vulnerable to those who know how to market to our weaknesses for their own advantage and possibly make decisions that are not in our best interests.  Choice is essential for a free society, a society that fosters innovation and growth, and opportunities for all.

In the end, if you combined two different shades of pinks, through individuality, choice and innovation, you will get the best pink and product available, adorable ballet slippers. 



References:
Iyengar, Sheena. (2010). TED video transcript: The Art of Choosing. Retrieved from http://www.ted.com/talks/sheena_iyengar_on_the_art_of_choosing/transcript?language=en

Merriam-Webster. (2015). Full Definition of Choice. Retrieved from http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/choice

Nosich, G. M. (2012). Learning to think things through: Critical thinking across the curriculum. Columbus, OH: Prentice Hall. (ISBN: 9780137085149)

Pecorino, P & O’Sullivan, S. (2002). Ethics: Deontological Theories on Natural Law, Problems. Retrieved from http://www.qcc.cuny.edu/SocialSciences/ppecorino/ETHICS_TEXT/Chapter_7_Deontological_Theories_Natural_Law/Problems_with_Natural_Law.htm








Tuesday, August 18, 2015

A500.2.3.RB_Standards


             MLSD 500: Leadership Found in Research



     A500.2.3RB – Standards
Submitted to ERAU Worldwide
in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements of the Degree of MBAA






Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University
Worldwide
Online Campus

August 18, 2015








           A standard is a level of quality, like a bar that is set. A document that outlines standards provides requirements, specifications, guidelines, or characteristics that can be used consistently to ensure that materials, products, processes and services are fit for their purpose (ISO, 2015).  I actually refer to a standard every day at my job.


           A standard of life is similar to a standard of living, evidenced by a set level of resources that may include such things as wealth and material goods and necessities.

Critical-thinking standards in a particular discipline are: reason, logic, rational, consistent, falsifiable, testable, well-organized, reliable, and being effective (Nosich, 2012). 

The non-critical-thinking standards tend to focus more on emotional feelings and attributes like: fun, exciting, feels good, attention-getting, popular, chic, spontaneous, advantageous, and beneficial to me, in fashion (Nosich, 2012).

My personal standards focus on safety and comfort, standards that are crucial to me for a sound foundation. The style and model of my car, for instance, represent the importance of reliable transportation, which I believe is a necessity. It also addresses my standards for comfort efficiency, so the car has a fast engine, calibrated for speed, yet it is designed well enough to mitigate risky malfunction. My job is just like my engine: fast-paced, in sync, challenging, yet conservative.

          My personal standards are identical to my professional standards. I have always been in search of a fast-paced, challenging - both intellectually and physically - standard of excellence. I have always found value in efficiencies; I organized myself so that I could be as productive and efficient as possible, as it was easier for me to accomplish my goals. When I decided to explore efficiences in business, particularly manufacturing, I found that the Lean Six Sigma Black Belt certification confirmed and formalized my natural inclinations. 



References:
ISO - International Organization for Standardization. (2015). What is a standard? Retrieved from http://www.iso.org/iso/home/standards.htm


Nosich, G. M. (2012). Learning to think things through: Critical thinking across the curriculum. Columbus, OH: Prentice Hall. (ISBN: 9780137085149)